In a nutshell, “ministerial exception” allows religious institutions of all kinds to be able to choose who their ministers are, even if in making such choices, federal laws are violated. That concept is something most Americans can somewhat agree with, given that one of the basic principles this country was founded on was separation of Church and State, as evidenced by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – Freedom of Religion. But this exception has taken on a life of its own, and some believe it has gone way too far.

The ministerial exception is used when a religious organization wants to fire someone, but doesn’t want to be hampered by various federal laws that protect certain classes of employees. As SCOTUS stated in the landmark case, EEOC v. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School, “ministers cannot bring employment discrimination claims against the religious organizations that employ them.”

Who Is a Minister?

When most people hear the word “minister,” they think someone that leads a religious congregation. As discussed, most might agree that congregations should be able to choose these leaders. Some, though, may not agree that they can be fired in violation of federal laws that were established to prevent workplace discrimination.

OK, perhaps teacher is a stretch of the term minister, but people can somewhat understand that – a Christian person teaching in a Christian school. However, a Kentucky lower federal court in Kant v. Lexington Theological Seminary used the ministerial exception to rule that a Jewish professor teaching an academic subject is a Christian minister even though he does not believe in Jesus Christ. Hmmm … some might view that as too broad of a definition of “minister.”

What’s Next?

Religious organizations use Hosanna-Tabor liberally when defending employment termination cases. Sometimes they succeed, sometimes they fail, and often courts end up ruling the case on a different point of law than “ministerial exception.” But courts can’t dodge this issue for much longer. Sooner or later, SCOTUS will be forced to define “minister” more clearly.

Another branch on this tree is the extent to which the exception can be used against employees. Ministerial exception has been used to kill an employer-employee relationship, but how about maiming it? Religious organizations have cited Hosanna-Tabor to claim protection for not providing contraceptive insurance, a federally mandated right, to secular and nonministerial employees. Time will tell how far and wide the courts will allow the ministerial exception net to be cast.

If you have been the subject of any workplace discrimination, contact a local employment lawyer, who can review your case and advise you of your legal rights and best next steps.

Related Resources:

  • Find an Employment Lawyer Near You (FindLaw Lawyer’s Directory)
  • Hospital Avoids Racial Discrimination Claim With Religious Exception (FindLaw Law and Daily Life)
  • Transgender Employment Discrimination Illegal Under Title VII (FindLaw U.S. Sixth Circuit)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules